One of the hardest jobs of being an investigator is presenting true evidence to a client. After comparing audio with video, video with audio, audio+video with other equipment etc, there are times where you think you caught a piece of evidence that is very good, but there are so many things that it could be other than paranormal.
You don't want to give the client false evidence and at the same time you don't want to throw out something amazing! You could go with the saying of "if there is any doubt,throw it out" and keep it for yourself I guess. We have came across a piece of audio on our last investigation that has left me scratching my head on how to handle this matter grrrrrrr.
What are your thoughts?